Time is Running Out for Business Development Teams

In the ever-evolving landscape of the business world, the pressure on companies to stay ahead of the curve has never been more intense. As the digital transformation accelerates, organizations are grappling with the urgent need to fortify their cybersecurity posture, a challenge that is particularly acute for small and medium-sized businesses (SMBs) within the defense industrial base. The Cybersecurity Maturity Model Certification (CMMC) program, introduced by the Department of Defense (DoD), aims to address this critical issue, but its implementation has raised significant concerns, especially among smaller players.

Navigating the CMMC Landscape: Challenges for Small Businesses

The CMMC program, designed to ensure defense contractors adhere to robust cybersecurity standards, has been a source of anxiety for many small businesses. The Office of Advocacy, an independent organization within the Small Business Administration (SBA), has been vocal in its concerns about the ability of SMBs to meet the CMMC requirements. In their public comments, SBA Advocacy officials highlighted the potential financial burden the program could impose on smaller companies, noting that the costs of compliance may not be easily recouped, especially for those operating on fixed-price contracts or serving as subcontractors to larger prime contractors.

The Cost Conundrum: Balancing Compliance and Profitability

One of the primary concerns raised by the SBA’s Office of Advocacy is the potential for the CMMC program to create an untenable financial landscape for small businesses. Major Clark, the Deputy Chief Counsel of the Office of Advocacy, emphasized that while the DoD has suggested that companies can recoup some of the costs associated with CMMC compliance, this may not be the case for many small businesses. Fixed-price contracts and the challenge of passing on these costs to larger prime contractors pose significant hurdles for SMBs, potentially undermining their ability to maintain profitability and remain competitive in the defense industry.

The Enclave Enigma: Seeking Clarity on Cost-Saving Measures

In an effort to alleviate the financial burden on small businesses, the DoD has introduced the concept of “IT enclaves,” which would allow companies to create specialized environments for handling sensitive defense information. The idea is that this approach would be less costly than implementing the DoD’s cybersecurity requirements across an entire enterprise network. However, the SBA’s Office of Advocacy argues that the DoD needs to provide more detailed guidance on the process of creating these enclaves, as the current rule lacks clarity on this critical aspect.

The Race for Certification: Ensuring Equitable Access for Small Businesses

Another concern raised by the SBA’s Office of Advocacy is the potential shortage of certified Third-Party Assessment Organizations (C3PAOs) to handle the influx of CMMC certifications. Stakeholders have expressed worries that if there are an insufficient number of C3PAOs, small businesses may end up being the last in line to receive their certifications, putting them at a significant disadvantage. The Office of Advocacy recommends that the DoD create a streamlined process to provide organizations with C3PAO certifications, ensuring that small business owners are not left behind in the race for compliance.

Adapting to the New Normal: Strategies for Small Businesses

As the CMMC program continues to evolve, small businesses in the defense industrial base must adapt to the changing landscape. Proactive planning and strategic partnerships may be key to navigating the challenges. Exploring cost-saving measures, such as the IT enclave approach, and actively engaging with the DoD and C3PAOs to understand the certification process can help SMBs stay ahead of the curve. Additionally, fostering collaborative relationships with larger prime contractors may open up opportunities for small businesses to share the burden of CMMC compliance, ultimately enhancing their chances of securing and retaining lucrative defense contracts.

Embracing Uncertainty: The Role of Policymakers and Regulatory Bodies

While the CMMC program aims to strengthen the cybersecurity posture of the defense industrial base, its implementation has raised significant concerns for small businesses. Policymakers and regulatory bodies, such as the DoD and the SBA, have a critical role to play in addressing these issues. Ongoing dialogue, clear guidance, and a willingness to adapt the program based on stakeholder feedback will be essential in ensuring that the CMMC requirements do not disproportionately burden smaller companies, ultimately preserving the diversity and competitiveness of the defense supply chain.

Navigating the Cybersecurity Landscape: Leveraging Expertise and Partnerships

As small businesses navigate the complexities of the CMMC program, they may need to seek out specialized expertise and strategic partnerships to enhance their chances of success. Atlantic Digital’s vCISO services are aimed at providing the CMMC implementation specialization needed to quickly implement CMMC requirements. Collaborating with Atlantic Digital vCISO consultants, IT service providers, and industry associations can help SMBs better understand the requirements, identify cost-effective solutions, and streamline the certification process. By leveraging external expertise and fostering collaborative relationships, small businesses can bolster their cybersecurity posture and position themselves for long-term growth in the defense industry with minimal cost.

Balancing Compliance and Innovation: The Delicate Tightrope for Small Businesses

The CMMC program’s emphasis on cybersecurity standards poses an additional challenge for small businesses, as they must balance the need for compliance with the imperative to maintain their innovative edge. Atlantic Digital’s vCISOs will provide the right balance between adhering to the CMMC requirements and preserving the agility and creativity that often characterize smaller organizations will be crucial for SMBs to remain competitive in the defense market. Fostering a culture of continuous improvement, embracing emerging technologies, and nurturing a skilled workforce will be essential in this delicate balancing act.

Collaboration and Communication: Strengthening the Defense Industrial Base

As the CMMC program continues to evolve, effective communication and collaboration between small businesses, larger prime contractors, and regulatory bodies will be paramount. Small businesses must proactively engage with their partners and the DoD to stay informed about the latest developments, voice their concerns, and explore innovative solutions. Similarly, policymakers and industry leaders must prioritize open dialogue and a willingness to adapt the program based on the unique needs and challenges faced by smaller companies. By fostering a collaborative ecosystem, the defense industrial base can navigate the CMMC landscape and emerge stronger, more resilient, and better equipped to safeguard sensitive information.

Embracing the Digital Transformation: Opportunities Amidst the Challenges

The CMMC program’s focus on cybersecurity standards aligns with the broader trend of digital transformation sweeping across industries. While the compliance requirements may pose short-term challenges for small businesses, the need to upgrade their technological capabilities presents an opportunity for them to future-proof their operations and enhance their overall competitiveness. By investing in robust cybersecurity infrastructure, data analytics, and cloud-based solutions, SMBs can not only meet the CMMC standards but also position themselves for long-term success in the rapidly evolving business landscape.

Cultivating a Resilient Mindset: Overcoming Adversity and Embracing Change

As small businesses confront the complexities of the CMMC program, it is essential that they cultivate a resilient mindset. Embracing a growth mindset, adaptability, and a willingness to learn and evolve will be key to navigating the challenges. By fostering a culture of continuous improvement, small businesses can transform the CMMC requirements into a catalyst for organizational growth, enhancing their cybersecurity posture and positioning themselves as trusted partners in the defense industrial base.

The Path Forward: Navigating the CMMC Landscape with Confidence

The CMMC program represents a significant shift in the defense industry’s approach to cybersecurity, and small businesses must be prepared to navigate this evolving landscape. By using Atlantic Digital’s services and proactively addressing the cost concerns, seeking clarity on cost-saving measures, and ensuring equitable access to certification resources, SMBs can enhance their chances of success. Moreover, by leveraging our expertise, fostering strategic partnerships, and embracing the opportunities presented by digital transformation, small businesses can not only meet the CMMC requirements but also position themselves for long-term growth and success in the defense market.

Accelerating CMMC Certification with Microsoft 365 GCC High: A Strategic Approach by Atlantic Digital (ADI) 

In response to findings by the Defense Industrial Base Cybersecurity Assessment Center (DIBCAC) regarding misuse in self-attesting to 800-171 standards, compliance requirements for the Defense Industrial Base (DIB) have shifted towards the Cybersecurity Maturity Model Certification (CMMC). This mandates third-party assessments and addresses critical cyber threats, necessitating a robust cybersecurity and compliance framework for DIB contractors. Atlantic Digital (ADI) is pivotal in guiding organizations towards achieving enterprise-level cybersecurity and CMMC compliance through strategic technological adoption and expert consultation. 

Cybersecurity Maturity Model Certification (CMMC) 

CMMC is a unified cybersecurity standard mandated by the U.S. Department of Defense (DoD) to safeguard the DIB from evolving cyber threats. Achieving CMMC certification requires adherence to stringent security controls and validation through third-party assessments. To expedite this process, leveraging appropriate cloud environments such as Microsoft 365 Government Community Cloud High (GCC High) is crucial. 

GCC High Overview 

GCC High is tailored for U.S. federal, state, and local government agencies and contractors handling sensitive government data. It integrates stringent security measures aligned with CMMC requirements, making it an ideal choice for organizations aiming to streamline their compliance journey. Microsoft’s comprehensive security tools, adherence to federal regulations like FedRAMP and CMMC, and scalable cloud solutions such as Azure and Microsoft 365, position GCC High as a preferred option for government cybersecurity needs. 

Accelerating CMMC Certification with GCC High 

GCC High offers robust security and compliance controls that significantly align with CMMC prerequisites. By adopting GCC High, organizations benefit from a sovereign cloud environment where data sovereignty requirements are inherently met. Advanced security features including Azure Advanced Threat Protection (ATP), Office 365 ATP, and Microsoft Defender ATP enhance threat detection capabilities, ensuring organizations meet CMMC’s advanced cybersecurity demands. 

Furthermore, GCC High facilitates continuous compliance monitoring and automated solutions, reducing the effort and time needed for CMMC audits and certification maintenance. 

Securing Your Path to CMMC Certification with ADI 

While GCC High serves as a foundational technology stack for CMMC readiness, achieving certification demands comprehensive policies, procedures, and controls implementation, alongside a validated audit by a Certified Third-Party Assessment Organization (C3PAO). ADI specializes in compliance, cybersecurity, and cloud migration, offering tailored solutions to navigate complexities associated with GCC High adoption and ensure sustainable CMMC compliance. 

Partnering with ADI provides organizations with the expertise needed to effectively leverage GCC High, mitigate implementation challenges, and confidently secure compliance with DoD standards. 

Conclusion 

In sum, Microsoft 365 GCC High presents a compelling solution for DIB contractors aiming to expedite their CMMC certification journey. By harnessing the capabilities of GCC High and partnering with ADI for expert guidance, organizations can enhance their cybersecurity posture, meet regulatory requirements, and ensure readiness to operate within the evolving landscape of government cybersecurity standards. 

The Critical Role of Enterprise Architects: Leveraging Technology for Strategic Growth in Businesses of All Sizes 

An Enterprise Architect (EA) plays a crucial role in aligning a company’s information technology (IT) with its business goals. As strategic planners, EAs collaborate with stakeholders, including management and IT teams, to create a comprehensive view of the organization’s strategy, processes, information, and IT assets. This knowledge is then used to ensure that business and IT are in alignment. 

The term “enterprise” in the context of an EA does not necessarily refer to the size of a business. Instead, it pertains to the scope of operations and the complexity of the technology and processes within the organization. Even smaller companies can benefit from the services of an EA, despite not being large-scale enterprises. 

IT has evolved from a utility function to a key differentiator in business, enabling organizations to leverage complexities for competitive advantage. The advent of cloud computing has disrupted traditional IT hierarchies, transforming capital expenditures (CapEx) into operational expenditures (OpEx) and adding layers of complexity. Small and medium-sized businesses now must adopt sophisticated IT strategies such as hybrid cloud, automation, and master sustainment while managing OpEx budgets to remain competitive. Additionally, the growing complexity and volume of cyber threats necessitate robust compliance and cybersecurity measures. 

These challenges underscore the importance of employing an EA in all IT environments. An EA can navigate these complexities, ensuring alignment between technology and business goals, and fostering sustainable, secure, and efficient operations. 

For small to medium-sized businesses, an EA provides a framework for scaling technology and processes as the company grows. They help ensure that IT investments are made wisely, avoiding costly overhauls in the future. An EA can also help businesses stay agile, adapting quickly to market changes or internal shifts in strategy. 

In essence, an EA builds a roadmap for the future of a company’s IT landscape, ensuring that all aspects of the organization’s technology support its business objectives. They play a key role in risk management, governance, and compliance implementation, particularly in heavily regulated industries. 

Without an EA, companies may find themselves with incompatible systems, duplicated efforts, or investments in technology that do not serve the long-term goals of the business. An EA provides the foresight and planning to prevent these issues, making them a valuable asset to any company, regardless of its size. 

Atlantic Digital’s (ADI) Enterprise Architect Solution 

An Enterprise Architect is not just for large enterprises but is essential for any business seeking to leverage technology effectively to support its strategic goals and remain competitive in today’s fast-paced digital world. Hiring an EA can be a strategic investment that pays dividends by creating a structured approach to growth and technology management. However, many small and medium-sized businesses cannot afford to hire a dedicated EA. Atlantic Digital (ADI) addresses this challenge by offering a tailored subscription model that bundles EA expertise with CISO services, provided by a team of seasoned professionals. This approach ensures that businesses of all sizes can access top-tier expertise, enabling them to navigate complexities, secure their operations, and drive sustainable growth. 

Why Government Estimates Underestimate CMMC Level 2 Costs

The true costs of CMMC Level 2 certification go beyond what meets the eye. From technological upgrades to human resource expenses, administrative tasks to third-party assessments, the financial implications are far-reaching. This article digs into why government estimates underestimate these costs, breaking down the often-overlooked aspects of compliance. It sheds light on the long-term maintenance expenses and the hidden challenges that CISOs face when implementing NIST SP800-171 requirements across various endpoints, including platforms like Azure GCC High.

Overview of CMMC Level 2 Certification

The Cybersecurity Maturity Model Certification (CMMC) Level 2 represents a significant step in safeguarding sensitive information within the Department of Defense (DoD) supply chain. This level focuses on advanced cyber hygiene, creating a logical progression from Level 1 to Level 3. It encompasses the protection of both Federal Contract Information (FCI) and Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI) [1].

Key Requirements

CMMC Level 2 compliance involves implementing 110 controls across 15 domains, all derived from NIST 800-171 [1]. These controls are distributed as follows:

  1. Access Control (AC): 22 controls
  2. Audit and Accountability (AU): 9 controls
  3. Awareness and Training (AT): 3 controls
  4. Configuration Management (CM): 9 controls
  5. Identification and Authentication (IA): 11 controls
  6. Incident Response (IR): 3 controls
  7. Maintenance (MA): 6 controls
  8. Media Protection (MP): 9 controls
  9. Personnel Security (PS): 2 controls
  10. Physical Protection (PE): 6 controls
  11. Recovery (RE): 2 controls
  12. Risk Management (RM): 3 controls
  13. Security Assessment (CA): 4 controls
  14. System and Communications Protection (SC): 16 controls
  15. System and Information Integrity (SI): 7 controls

Achieving compliance requires a comprehensive approach, including the implementation of policies and procedures, technical controls, and robust education and training channels [1].

Assessment Process

The assessment process for CMMC Level 2 involves Third Party Assessor Organizations (C3PAOs) accredited by the CMMC Accreditation Body (CMMC-AB) [1]. These organizations employ certified assessors to evaluate an organization’s cybersecurity practices and controls against the CMMC framework.

The assessment includes:

  1. Review of existing security documentation
  2. Interviews with key personnel
  3. On-site inspections of systems and physical security

After the assessment, the C3PAO provides a report on their findings, which is then submitted to the CMMC Accreditation Body for review, evaluation, and certification [1]. The Department of Defense will have access to the assessment results and final report, but these detailed results will not be made public [2].

Timeline for Implementation

While the exact implementation timeline for CMMC 2.0 is still evolving, it’s expected to be codified by the end of 2024 and incorporated into contracts in Q1 2025 [3]. However, it’s crucial to note that NIST 800-171, which forms the basis of CMMC, is already a requirement today.

Organizations should not wait to begin their CMMC implementation plan. The path to compliance can be lengthy, involving several steps:

  1. Familiarizing with CMMC Level 2 requirements
  2. Conducting a comprehensive gap analysis
  3. Developing and implementing a remediation plan
  4. Allocating necessary resources
  5. Training staff on CMMC requirements and cybersecurity best practices
  6. Implementing required policies, procedures, and documentation
  7. Regularly reviewing and updating cybersecurity practices
  8. Engaging with CMMC consultants or C3PAOs for guidance
  9. Performing a self-assessment before the official CMMC assessment
  10. Scheduling the CMMC assessment with an accredited C3PAO [1]

It’s important to note that while the DoD intends to allow companies to receive contract awards with a Plan of Actions and Milestones (POA&M) in place, there will be a baseline number of requirements that must be achieved prior to contract award [4]. Therefore, organizations should prioritize closing any security gaps to ensure they meet the minimum compliance requirements.

Breaking Down the Government’s Cost Estimates

The Department of Defense (DoD) has provided cost estimates for CMMC compliance, but these figures often fall short of the true expenses organizations face. To understand why, it’s crucial to examine the components included, calculation methods, and underlying assumptions in these estimates.

Components Included

The DoD’s cost estimates for CMMC compliance encompass several key components:

  1. Assessment Costs: These include initial assessments and recurring evaluations every three years.
  2. Affirmation Costs: Annual costs associated with affirming compliance.
  3. Implementation Costs: Expenses related to technical changes required to meet CMMC standards.
  4. Support Costs: Ongoing expenses for maintaining compliance, including staff and external service providers.

For a Level 2 CMMC assessment, the DoD estimates the combined cost of assessment and affirmation to be around $104,670 [5]. This figure, however, doesn’t paint the full picture of compliance expenses.

Calculation Methods

The DoD’s calculation methods for CMMC costs vary based on the certification level and organization size:

  1. Level 1 Costs:
    • Small entities: Estimated at nearly $6,000
    • Larger entities: Approximately $4,000
  2. Level 2 Costs:
    • Small entities: Over $37,000 for self-assessment and affirmations
    • Larger entities: Nearly $49,000 for self-assessment and affirmations
    • Certification assessment: $104,670 for small entities, $118,000 for larger entities [5]
  3. Level 3 Costs:
    • Small organizations: $490,000 in recurring engineering costs, $2.7 million in non-recurring engineering costs
    • Larger organizations: $4.1 million in recurring engineering costs, $21.1 million in non-recurring engineering costs [5]

These calculations attempt to account for organizational differences, such as IT infrastructure complexity and the likelihood of outsourcing cybersecurity services.

Underlying Assumptions

The government’s cost estimates are based on several key assumptions:

  1. Pre-existing Compliance: The DoD assumes that organizations have already implemented the security requirements mandated by FAR clause 52.204-21 and DFARS clause 252.204-7012 [5]. This assumption significantly impacts the estimated costs, as it doesn’t account for expenses related to achieving baseline compliance.
  2. Organizational Differences: The estimates consider that smaller firms generally have less complex IT and cybersecurity infrastructures and are more likely to outsource these services [5].
  3. External Support: The calculations anticipate that organizations pursuing Level 2 assessments will seek consulting or implementation assistance from external service providers [5].
  4. Hourly Rates: The DoD estimates that an experienced IT professional capable of supporting CMMC compliance efforts would cost around $86 per hour [6].
  5. Implementation Timeframe: The estimates assume that implementation could consume at least one person’s full-time job for 12-18 months [6].

It’s important to note that these assumptions may not hold true for all organizations, leading to potential underestimation of actual costs. For instance, the annual full-time salary of an employee being paid $86.24 per hour would be around $179,000 [6], which is not explicitly factored into the government’s estimates.

Technological Costs Often Overlooked

When organizations pursue CMMC Level 2 certification, they often underestimate the technological costs involved. These expenses can significantly impact the overall budget and are frequently overlooked in initial assessments. Let’s delve into the key areas where technological costs tend to accumulate.

Hardware Upgrades

Many businesses find themselves needing to upgrade their infrastructure to meet the required security protocols set forth by CMMC 2.0 [7]. This can involve replacing outdated hardware that may not support the latest security features or adding new components to enhance system protection. The cost of these upgrades can vary widely depending on the organization’s current setup and the extent of changes needed.

Software Licenses

Implementing CMMC Level 2 requirements often necessitates the adoption of new software solutions or the upgrade of existing ones. This may include:

  1. Multi-factor authentication systems
  2. Encryption tools
  3. Vulnerability scanning software
  4. Incident response management platforms

It’s crucial to ensure that any encryption software used is FIPS 140-2 compliant, as this is a specific requirement for handling Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI) [8]. The licensing costs for these software solutions can add up quickly, especially for larger organizations.

Cloud Services

Cloud services play a significant role in CMMC compliance, but they come with their own set of costs and considerations. For instance, many organizations consider using Microsoft’s Government Community Cloud (GCC) or GCC High for CMMC compliance. However, these solutions can be expensive and often require deployment across the entire organization [9].

An alternative approach is to use cloud platforms specifically designed for CMMC compliance. For example, some solutions can be layered over existing systems like Microsoft 365, allowing organizations to protect CUI without a complete infrastructure overhaul [9]. This approach can be more cost-effective, especially for small and medium-sized businesses.

It’s worth noting that the Department of Defense (DoD) estimates for CMMC compliance costs don’t fully account for these technological expenses. For instance, the DoD projects that a Level 2 certification assessment would cost nearly $105,000 for small entities and approximately $118,000 for larger entities [5]. However, these figures primarily cover assessment and affirmation activities, not the implementation of security requirements themselves [5].

In reality, the technological costs can be substantial. For a small organization pursuing CMMC Level 3 (which builds upon Level 2), the estimated recurring and non-recurring engineering costs associated with meeting the security mandates are $490,000 and $2.7 million, respectively [5]. For larger organizations, these figures jump to $4.1 million and $21.1 million [5].

While these numbers are for Level 3, they give an indication of the significant technological investments required even at Level 2. Organizations must carefully consider these often-overlooked technological costs when budgeting for CMMC compliance to avoid unexpected financial strain.

Human Resource Expenses

Human resource expenses often constitute a significant portion of the costs associated with achieving CMMC Level 2 compliance. These expenses encompass various aspects, including hiring cybersecurity experts, training existing staff, and providing ongoing education.

Hiring Cybersecurity Experts

Organizations pursuing CMMC Level 2 certification may find themselves in need of specialized cybersecurity expertise. The Department of Defense (DoD) estimates that small defense contractors will need to spend $104,670 to achieve CMMC Level 2 with a C3PAO assessment and submit annual affirmations of compliance [10]. This figure includes the costs associated with hiring cybersecurity professionals or consultants to guide the compliance process.

For organizations lacking internal security expertise, outside partners can save time and money [11]. These experts can provide valuable assistance in conducting gap assessments, implementing necessary controls, and preparing for the CMMC audit. A gap assessment for an organization can cost approximately between $15,000 and $35,000 [10].

Training Existing Staff

Training existing staff is a crucial component of CMMC Level 2 compliance. The CMMC Assessment Guide emphasizes the importance of security awareness and training for all employees [12]. However, the extent of training may vary depending on the organization’s strategy for segmenting the Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI) scope.

Organizations must implement a comprehensive training program that covers:

  1. Security awareness training for all users
  2. Cybersecurity essentials for all users of IT systems
  3. Role-based training for specific positions

The training should encompass various topics, including:

  • Cybersecurity terms and concepts
  • Threats and vulnerabilities in the work environment
  • Policies and procedures to follow
  • Rules of acceptable use of information and information systems

It’s important to note that awareness is not the same as training. While awareness presentations focus on broad topics, training involves a more active learner and focuses on building knowledge and skills to perform specific jobs [12].

Ongoing Education

CMMC Level 2 compliance requires ongoing education to maintain the organization’s cybersecurity posture. This includes:

  1. Regular cybersecurity audits
  2. Periodic network upgrades
  3. Continuous employee training to stay ahead of emerging threats [13]

Organizations must establish a robust education and training channel to ensure personnel with appropriate clearances adequately understand their role in protecting the environment [1]. This ongoing education is crucial for maintaining compliance and adapting to evolving cybersecurity threats.

The NICE Framework can be a valuable resource for organizations in structuring their ongoing education programs. It helps in describing the tasks performed, the people who carry them out, and the relevant training needed [12]. Organizations can use this framework to identify the knowledge, skills, and tasks associated with specific work roles, ensuring that their training programs are comprehensive and tailored to their needs.

By investing in human resource expenses related to cybersecurity expertise, training, and ongoing education, organizations can build a strong foundation for CMMC Level 2 compliance. While these costs may be significant, they are essential for creating a robust cybersecurity posture and meeting the stringent requirements of the CMMC framework.

Administrative and Documentation Costs

Policy Development

Organizations pursuing CMMC Level 2 certification must invest significant time and resources in developing comprehensive policies and procedures. These policies need to address the management of Contractor Risk Managed Assets, which are part of the CMMC Assessment Scope but are not required to be physically or logically separated from CUI Assets [14]. The development of risk-based information security policies, procedures, and practices for these assets is crucial, as they will be reviewed by assessors to ensure compliance [14].

Record Keeping

Proper documentation is a critical aspect of CMMC compliance and contributes significantly to administrative costs. Organizations are required to maintain detailed records, including:

  1. Asset inventory documentation
  2. System Security Plan (SSP) documentation
  3. Network diagrams of the assessment scope

These documents must clearly show how Contractor Risk Managed Assets are managed using the organization’s risk-based security policies, procedures, and practices [14]. The cost of maintaining these records can be substantial, as it often requires dedicated personnel or external consultants.

Audit Preparation

Preparing for a CMMC audit involves considerable time and financial investment. For a Level 2 CMMC assessment, the Department of Defense estimates that the combined cost of assessment and affirmation will be around $104,670 [6]. This figure includes expenses related to planning and preparing for the assessment, conducting the assessment, and reporting the results [5].

Organizations should anticipate the following costs associated with audit preparation:

  1. Gap assessments: A typical gap assessment for an organization with 250 employees can cost between $15,000 and $35,000 [10].
  2. Readiness assessments: These are more comprehensive than gap assessments and ensure that everything is in place from a CMMC perspective [10].
  3. Consulting costs: External expertise may be required to guide the compliance process [6].
  4. Internal resource allocation: Preparing for CMMC compliance can consume at least one person’s full-time job for 12-18 months, with an estimated annual salary of around $179,000 for an experienced IT professional [6].

The actual CMMC audit costs, while not yet formally defined, are estimated to range between $20,000 and $60,000 [10]. This estimate assumes a fully defined audit program with standardized components such as questionnaires, information gathering processes, and specified reporting formats.

It’s important to note that these administrative and documentation costs are ongoing. Organizations must factor in maintenance expenses, which include active monitoring, threat detection, and incident reporting between CMMC assessments [6]. The Department of Defense projects that the annualized costs for contractors and other non-government entities to implement CMMC 2.0 will be about $4 billion, calculated over a 20-year horizon [5].

Third-Party Assessment Organization (C3PAO) Fees

Initial Assessment Costs

The implementation of CMMC Level 2 certification brings with it significant financial considerations, particularly in the realm of Third-Party Assessment Organization (C3PAO) fees. The Department of Defense (DoD) has estimated that small defense contractors will need to spend approximately $104,670 to achieve CMMC Level 2 with a C3PAO assessment and submit annual affirmations of compliance [11]. This figure encompasses various components of the assessment process, including planning and preparation, conducting the assessment, and reporting the results.

Breaking down the costs, the DoD estimates that conducting the assessment itself accounts for the largest portion at $76,743. Planning and preparing for the C3PAO assessment is projected to cost $20,699, while reporting the assessment results is estimated at $2,851 [11]. It’s important to note that these figures include time spent by both in-house IT specialists and External Service Providers (ESPs) such as Registered Practitioners (RPs), Certified CMMC Assessors (CCAs), and C3PAOs.

However, real-world scenarios suggest that the actual costs may vary significantly. Recent reports from contractors reveal that quotes received from C3PAOs for a Level 2 assessment under CMMC 2.0 ranged from $30,000 to $381,000 [15]. The wide range in pricing is largely attributed to the number of environments that need to be assessed independently, with the higher end of the spectrum involving five separate environments.

Re-certification Expenses

CMMC compliance is not a one-time expense. Contractors must be re-certified at regular intervals, adding to the long-term financial commitment. As it stands currently, CMMC certifications are generally valid for 3 years [10]. This means that organizations must factor in the costs of re-certification into their long-term budgeting.

The DoD’s cost estimates include provisions for annual affirmations of compliance. Over a three-year period, these affirmations are expected to cost $4,377, or $1,459 per year [11]. These ongoing expenses are crucial for maintaining compliance and ensuring that an organization’s cybersecurity posture remains up to date with evolving threats and standards.

Preparation Assistance

Given the complexity and importance of CMMC certification, many organizations seek external assistance in preparing for their assessments. The DoD anticipates that organizations pursuing Level 2 assessments will often seek consulting or implementation assistance from external service providers [5]. This additional support can help organizations get ready for assessments and participate effectively in the process with C3PAOs.

While this preparation assistance represents an additional cost, it can be a valuable investment. Proper preparation can help minimize billable hours during the actual assessment, which ultimately determines the final price. To this end, organizations are advised to pair their documentation carefully, linking it to scoped information systems and assessment objectives [15]. Utilizing solutions that track required practice performance and store evidence can streamline this process and potentially reduce overall costs.

Long-Term Compliance Maintenance Expenses

Maintaining CMMC Level 2 compliance is an ongoing process that requires significant long-term investment. Organizations must factor in recurring costs to ensure their cybersecurity posture remains up to date with evolving threats and standards. The Department of Defense projects that the annualized costs for contractors and other non-government entities to implement CMMC 2.0 will be about $4 billion, calculated over a 20-year horizon [5].

Continuous Monitoring Tools

Implementing and maintaining continuous monitoring tools is a crucial aspect of long-term compliance. These tools help organizations detect vulnerabilities in real-time, collect evidence for corrective actions, and offer ready-to-use security policies [16]. Continuous monitoring is essential for maintaining a robust security posture and ensuring ongoing compliance with CMMC Level 2 requirements.

Regular System Updates

Regular system updates and patching are critical components of long-term compliance maintenance. Organizations must factor in the costs associated with:

  1. Upgrading existing systems
  2. Patching vulnerabilities
  3. Implementing new tools as required [16]

These ongoing maintenance activities are essential for addressing new security threats and ensuring that the organization’s cybersecurity measures remain effective over time.

Incident Response Planning

Developing and maintaining an incident response plan is a key requirement for CMMC Level 2 compliance. Organizations must have procedures in place for:

  1. Monitoring and promptly acting on security alerts indicating unauthorized use of IT systems
  2. Performing periodic scans of IT systems
  3. Scanning files from external sources when they are downloaded or acted upon
  4. Updating malicious code protection mechanisms as soon as new versions are available [1]

The costs associated with maintaining an effective incident response capability, including regular testing and updates to the plan, must be factored into long-term compliance expenses.

It’s important to note that while the initial certification costs for CMMC Level 2 are significant, with the Department of Defense estimating around $104,670 for small defense contractors [11], the long-term maintenance expenses can be even more substantial. Organizations must budget for recurring costs, as CMMC certifications are generally valid for 3 years [10]. This means that companies must plan for re-certification expenses every three years, in addition to the ongoing costs of maintaining compliance.

To optimize long-term compliance costs, organizations should consider:

  1. Establishing clear communication and project scopes with consultants
  2. Negotiating fee structures for ongoing support
  3. Researching and selecting cost-effective technology solutions that fulfill CMMC requirements without exerting undue strain on the budget [17]

By taking a strategic approach to long-term compliance maintenance, organizations can better manage the ongoing expenses associated with CMMC Level 2 certification while ensuring they maintain a robust cybersecurity posture.

Conclusion

The journey to achieve CMMC Level 2 certification has a significant impact on organizations, both financially and operationally. Government estimates often fall short of capturing the true costs, which encompass not only initial assessments but also ongoing expenses for technology upgrades, staff training, and long-term compliance maintenance. These hidden costs can put a strain on businesses, especially smaller contractors, as they work to meet the stringent cybersecurity requirements.

To wrap up, while CMMC Level 2 certification is crucial to protect sensitive information, organizations need to plan carefully to manage the associated expenses. This means looking beyond the initial certification costs to consider the long-term investment in cybersecurity infrastructure, human resources, and continuous improvement. By taking a comprehensive approach to budgeting and implementation, businesses can better prepare themselves to meet the challenges of CMMC compliance while maintaining their competitive edge in the defense contracting landscape.